Lettre d’injures à la société et à mes géniteurs

Si vous êtes capables de comprendre ce qui suit, alors vous avez déjà passé (gaspillé) plus de 20 % (à vingt pour cent vous n’êtes toujours pas socialement émancipé), donc 20 % de votre vie sur la planète (si tout se passe selon vos espérances). Pour quoi faire ? Pour quoi vivez-vous et surtout pour qui vivez-vous ?

Et si tout comme moi vous avez une très forte envie de dire ses mille vérités à la Société humaine dans son ensemble, c’est une chose qu’il ne faut pas manquer de réaliser avant de quitter ce repère de margoulins, qu’on appelle Terre, qui sont encore vos associés pour très peu de temps. Profitez de vos vertèbres rouillées, de votre manque de sommeil, de vos courtes nuits, de votre cerveau encore vaillant pour composer une belle ode à la vengeance.

Tout d’abord, quelles raisons vous a-t-on données à la fabrication de votre existence ? Il s’agit de « vos » raisons d’exister, et non « leurs » raisons personnelles ? S’ils vous ont dégoté des raisons à votre existence alors ce sont de sacrés raconteurs de bobards et vous êtes (étiez) bougrement naïfs. Si tout comme moi vous n’avez pas questionné vos parents, c’est que probablement vous êtes nés dans un système patriarcal dictatorial dans lequel votre cerveau a été totalement blindé à la culture ambiante. Mais aucune éducation ne peut éviter les fonctionnalités neutres qui permettent de sortir de ce bridage infantile. J’ai donc eu du bol d’en échapper contrairement à la majorité des membres de ma famille, mais on n’en sort que difficilement, car l’imprégnation culturelle est grande, quasi totale.

N’hésitez pas à engueuler vertement la société, c’est parfaitement votre droit, car elle est complice du crime de la fabrication de votre existence (multiples crimes selon ses propres lois et c’est bien là le plus marrant). Vous êtes bien gentils de ne pas l’avoir fait plus tôt ou d’une autre manière que verbale. N’oubliez pas qu’ils vous ont contraints d’exister pour leur service, et certainement pas pour le vôtre. Vous ne leur devez rien, absolument rien, strictement rien, mais ils vous doivent tout (en tant qu’humain vantard bien sûr, les animaux eux ne font que stupidement se reproduire).

Je comprends pourquoi un individu veut continuer d’exister, c’est-à-dire poursuivre l’existence qui lui a été infligée, imposée, donnée (choisissez le verbe qui vous convient), mais je ne comprends pas pourquoi un être intelligent veut contraindre une autre personne, son égale, à exister, d’autant plus qu’il ne maitrise pas du tout la fabrication de cette personne et qu’il va l’installer dans le berceau-poubelle-Terre. Et pourtant j’existe, et certains imaginent que je dois me tenir coi au risque de renaitre en pire qu’humain. Comment ça pourrait-il être pire ?

Si vous avez imaginé que vos parents sont des gentils et que la société est là pour vous aider, eh bien je me charge de vous faire changer d’avis.

Parents ! Peut-on prétendre aimer l’enfant qu’on a installé dans une poubelle en jouant à la roulette russe sur sa tête pour se faire un cadeau à soi-même ?

Quelle poubelle ? Mais, la Terre voyons ! Ouvrez les yeux !

Pour la roulette russe, c’est là-dessous :

Pourquoi en vouloir à ses parents et à la société ? Par exemple pour être né gravement handicapé sans pouvoir mener une vie « normale », sans pouvoir ni courir ni marcher, sans pouvoir être éduqué correctement. Parce que la tétraplégie a tué la vie de mes rêves qui ne se passe pas comme prévu. Pour être gravement malade de naissance, ou avoir attrapé plus tard quelque chose d’irrémédiable que la médecine ne peut soigner. Pour avoir un cancer, une sclérose, une faiblesse cardiaque, une parkinson, pour être alzheimer. Pour avoir les os fragiles, les muscles faibles, les organes défectueux, le cerveau léger.

Pour être au chômage, avoir un métier de merde, car possesseur d’un QI de merde ou par malchance. Pour être SDF, faire la cloche. Parce que la famine règne dans le pays, dans le désert, dans le nord glacé, dans le sahel. Pour avoir subi le terrorisme et être une victime directe ou indirecte. Pour vivre dans une nation en guerre, pour avoir subi un bombardement d’un pays ennemi ou ami qui aurait décimé ma famille et m’aurait allégé de mes deux jambes. Pour être un enfant mendiant, un enfant esclave, un enfant mineur, un enfant prostitué. Pour être un vieillard solitaire, grabataire, aigri, malheureux. Pour ressentir et voir douloureusement arriver la mort dans la douleur sans pouvoir ne rien y faire.

Pour… mais je crois que ça suffit pour en vouloir à la société, à toutes les sociétés humaines dans tous les lieux et toutes les époques. Rien que le fait que tout ceci puisse exister, que les militaires et les flics existent, que les gouvernants existent, que les fonctionnaires existent, que le patronat existe, que la richesse extrême coexiste avec la pauvreté extrême, et que la médecine existe, ainsi que les hôpitaux et les ONG, que les migrants de la survie existent, que les restos du cœur aient besoin d’exister, que les stupides religions existent pour tenter de nous apaiser alors que nous n’aurions pas besoin d’être apaisés si nous n’existions pas, et qu’on ait osé lancer la fabrication de mon existence, d’une existence consciente et sensible quelconque, dans un tel bain pestilentiel mondial permanent, me débecte au plus haut point.

Est-ce que vous avez lancé ma fabrication pour que je me serve à moi-même avant d’exister ou encore pour que mes expériences de vivant servent à décorer ma tombe ? Avez-vous fabriqué un imbécile incapable de comprendre l’absurdité de l’existence ? Manque de chance, pour moi, je suis parvenu à m’extirper par hasard de l’idiotie bienheureuse animale, du crétinisme ambiant général qui est le lot de l’immense majorité des autistes que sont presque tous les humains spécialisés dans leur propre rouage social et fier de l’être. Mais je ne suis pas Pangloss ni Candide. Mon jardin d’agrément, mon potager, ma bassecour, mon terrain de jeu, c’est la Terre dans sa totalité. Vous le salopez, ce jardin dans lequel vous m’avez balancé de force. Il est invivable. J’ai le droit de le saccager encore davantage ce jardin, j’ai le droit de me venger des pousseurs et de leurs complices, mais je ne l’ai jamais fait. Pourquoi ? Je l’ignore. J’ai sans doute autre chose à faire…

Société ! Une société qui commande, qui ordonne, qui dirige, qui menace, n’est pas une société d’associés égaux, mais une dictature d’oligarques profiteurs. Une société qui autorise la fabrication de personnes handicapées, les considérant sans doute comme des dommages collatéraux, est une immonde pourriture. Une société qui ne prévoit pas l’installation de ses propres associés avant (je précise bien, « avant ») le lancement de leur fabrication est imprévoyante donc stupide, ou se fout « royalement » de ses concitoyens. Pour qui nous prenez-vous, vous les dirigeants, sommes-nous des crétins de français ? Qu’est-ce que ça vous fait, messieurs les patriotes, d’enrichir la génétique française avec nos gènes de crétins ? N’avez-vous pas l’impression de cracher en l’air ?

Si nous sommes une société, comme la Constitution française le précise une trentaine de fois, comment peut-on être associé de force quand la Loi l’interdit ? Une fois associé quel mot ai-je à dire sur cette société ? Quand chacun peut rajouter un associé sans le consentement d’aucun des autres associés, y compris le nouvel associé fabriqué pour servir, comment peut-on appeler ça une société ? Une société d’esclaves d’esclaves ne sera jamais une démocratie. Mais qu’ai-je à faire d’une démocratie ou de tel ou tel type de gouvernements ? Vous ai-je demandé à être gouverné avant d’exister ? Tant que le monde aura besoin d’être gouverné, ne faites pas d’enfant. Un esclave qui réclame la liberté, mais qui fabrique un esclave est d’une grande stupidité, il n’est pas étonnant que l’humanité vive en guerre permanente d’esclaves contre d’autres esclaves.

De nos jours ils foutent les bébés dès 3 ans dans des crèches pour débarrasser les parents de ce boulot de surveillance et de torchage de cul, et pour déjà socialiser le moutard qui n’a pas demandé à vivre ni à être éduqué. C’est l’école de la vie, l’apprentissage au travail qui commence. Car vous avez été fabriqué pour tenir un rôle social. La société prend en charge bébé qui va bientôt devenir responsable d’exister (insondable mystère de la magouille sociale). Vous allez être un rouage que vous le vouliez ou non. Que vous soyez social, asocial, ou antisocial, vous êtes un rouage.

En fait, vous ne voulez rien à la naissance. Votre cerveau est totalement vierge de connaissance. Si vos éducateurs savent s’y prendre, ils parviendront à vous rendre enthousiaste pour la vie que vous allez mener. Voyez comme le monde est beau ! Comme ils vous cachent le plus laid, évidemment qu’il vous parait beau, et puisqu’ils vous le disent et l’inscrivent dans votre cerveau meuble et blanc, l’idée de la beauté du monde va germer, ou devrait germer sans trop de difficulté. Ne sont-ils pas gentils vos éducateurs ? Par comparaison, ils vous montrent les pires exemples de l’autre côté du monde. Imaginez, vous disent-ils, si vous viviez là-bas ce qu’ils font aux enfants. Il y a toujours loups et ogres loin de chez papa maman.

Mais avez-vous demandé à exister dans telle ou telle condition, dans tel ou tel lieu, à telle ou telle époque, au milieu de tels abrutis décérébrés ? Est-ce aux existants de choisir les conditions d’une vie bonne ? C’est moi qui décide pour moi du beau, du bien, du bon, du juste, pour moi. Qui est responsable de m’avoir fabriqué ? Est-ce moi ? Qui est responsable d’avoir farci mon cerveau, vierge à la naissance, de conneries ? Est-ce moi ?

La société a autorisé ma fabrication. Elle est responsable de mon existence et des conditions de mon existence. Se sent-elle responsable ? Non, elle prétend que vous êtes libres, mais fait tout pour vous enrégimenter. Elle est forte pour ça. C’est pratique cette méthode à la Ponce Pilate. Maintenant qu’elle vous a parait-il éduqué avec toute l’attention dont elle est incapable, démerdez-vous pour gagner votre vie. « Gagner votre vie ». Comment ça ? C’est ma vie ? Mais c’est vous qui me l’avez infligée bande de demeurés de société et parents ! Pourquoi devrais-je la gagner ? N’avez-vous donc pas prévu une vie mirifique pour mes beaux yeux puisque vous semblez si heureux de m’avoir enfanté ?

Résumé : Je suis mis au monde pour servir ceux qui existent déjà, car la procréation n’est utile qu’à ceux qui existent déjà. Ils me disent, quand je suis à même de comprendre, avec leur méthode de compréhension dont ils ont badigeonné mon cerveau sans certitude de réussite, que je suis un homme (une femme) libre. Puisque je suis libre, selon leur propre Loi, ils s’exonèrent de surveiller mon bienêtre et de me l’accorder. Je dois faire mon bienêtre moi-même. (Je rappelle que je n’ai pas demandé à exister, pas plus avec cette tête d’œuf farcie par leur soin qu’avec ce corps d’asticot qu’ils m’ont octroyé par hasard.)

Comme je n’ai pas d’autre moyen de vivre, je dois chercher et trouver du boulot au tarif minimal dans un pays où le chômage est permanent, cela s’appelle de l’esclavage par coercition masquée et du dumping social dont vous êtes les objets-dindons de la farce. Je dois jouer des coudes et écraser des pieds pour grimper l’échelle sociale, c’est-à-dire pour mieux m’enrichir, donc appauvrir d’autres péquins à l’autre bout du monde, et surtout enrichir le pays puisque je suis imposé dès que je gagne quelques tunes et même quand je dépense ce même argent déjà taxé. Ce n’est pas l’argent qui est taxé, ce sont mes gestes sociaux. Je n’ai toujours pas demandé à exister.

Grâce à cet argent durement gagné et taxé, je visite le monde comme tout le monde « civilisé » peut le faire tandis que l’autre monde affamé me regarde les visiter, avec envie. Puis j’atteins la bérézina, la retraite me réussit, mais je suis toujours esclave de mon corps et des moyens de transport et des limites sociétales, ce corps qu’ils m’ont octroyé sans vergogne et qui décrépit sans possibilité de faire cesser ce dépérissement. J’ai appris la mort par moi-même, personne ne m’avait prévenu de cette ouverture finale vers le néant par décomposition douloureuse. Décrépitude pas plus demandée que l’existence, mais à peine commencée que c’est déjà fini comme le dit si bien le poète.

La prochaine fois (renaissance ou métempsychose), je serais Président si vous êtes toujours là et toujours aussi cons, ainsi j’aurais l’index sur le bouton nucléaire prêt à disperser vos âneries dans un nouveau soleil.

Mon cerveau m’appartient dites-vous, mais je suis né tel que vous m’avez fabriqué, et tel un livre blanc (blanc ou pas ça ne changerait rien puisque je vous dois ma fabrication et mon éducation dans votre culture), donc d’où viennent ces injures que je vous glisse dans l’oreille ? C’est simple à comprendre, je vous insulte parce que vous me demandez de vous insulter, sinon comment comprendre ce mécanisme de génération d’insultes que vous avez mis vous-mêmes dans mon cerveau-automate et ma bouche desséchée pour finir dans vos esgourdes éventées ? Que doit-on en déduire ? Eh bien, vous désirez changer, mais n’y parvenez pas. Alors vous réclamez l’autoflagellation par vos propres associés… Je ne vois pas d’autre explication.

Comme il s’agit d’une lettre d’adieu définitif, je vous dis « à la non-revoyure ! » et faites cesser ce cauchemar bande de cinglés.

Et finalement pour imiter les jurons du capitaine Haddock : abrégés de tintinophile mal congelés, bougres d’extrait d’hydrocéphales, cannibales déplumés, concentrés de chapons, emplâtrés à la graisse de scolopendre, faces de butors, vendeurs de guano, générateurs de malheur, fangeux vers de terre, ben-ladens de carnaval, bougres de Papous bretons et corses à la fois, perruches déplumées, sous-divisions d’ectoplasme, trafiquants de chair fraiche, faussaires de faux dollars, cucurbitacées à la graisse de porc épique, espèce d’astracan mal peigné, d’artagnans à quatre pattes, zouaves extraterrestres, ectoplasmes sur planche à roulettes, bougres d’extraits de potimarron, jus de lave-vaisselle, espèce de carpes mal embouchées, patagons d’étatisés islamiques, vampires à la graisse de ta fille, pirates de bateau-lavoir, espèce de rhinolophes mal empaillés, macchabées des égouts…

Encore un mot, vous êtes tellement abruptement cons que vous ne vous êtes même pas encore rendu compte que vous n’aviez pas de libre arbitre d’où votre impossibilité à trouver la solution pourtant simplissime à tous vos problèmes gigantesques. C’est à mourir de rire…

Fin – E. Berlherm

(Je vous recommande également le sujet suivant : « Pourquoi ai-je le droit de vanner à outrance la religion ? »

http://societeshumaines.blogspot.fr/2017/12/pourquoi-ai-je-le-droit-de-vanner.html)

Guilty or Innocent

We all know that our laws are artificial, that is, they are made by men to manage men. But there are also natural laws that are what the body commands us. These are for the most obvious, breathe, drink, eat, defecate, sleep and I would add our weak muscular and intellectual abilities compared to… who you want much better than yourself in the animal or imaginary kingdom.

What is the reason for a social law? It is simple, it means that it is not natural to do what the law commands you, otherwise, it would not be necessary. For example, as the monarch of the Little Prince would say, “I order you to breathe”. We must, therefore, restrain the recalcitrant. Governors like bridling, that's the only way they have to show their power. Example of a stupid law, “I order you to get up and go to bed when I decide, it's me who orders.” This is the law of time change that serves no purpose but to show the power of the ruler over the whole common people. This is the only law that involves everyone without anybody escaping it.

Suppose you make a child freely, disabled or not you and him, orphaned or not you and him (to be disabled or orphan and to make a child is quite aberrant, rather filthy that is to say an unspeakable crummy because you know it can happen to him and it does not seem to worry you at all.) So you make him with full knowledge of the cause and effect on the poor rug rat with the tacit endorsement of your fellow citizens. You inflict existence on your child, who is a person just like you, as well as the commands of Nature. (If you do not mind giving orders, it implies that you accept the orders, yet I hear that you do not like them very much.) These orders are your orders since the procreation of your child is voluntary and that you hope that the little one will be as perfect as possible… after having looked at you in a mirror, excluding the common accidents that arise in life unexpectedly. Your child has not yet come out of his mother's womb, you perhaps, you give him orders (maybe you have not died), starting with the one to exist. The child will then spend his first 18 years undergoing your other orders and learning social laws before being released as a full partner in the culture broth. I hope you have not missed anywhere. Eighteen years is a lot, and it is also proof that it is very complicated to insert a person in the world since it takes almost a quarter of his life (of the richest Westerners otherwise it will be 1/3 or 1/2 or less) to teach him the basics. As for me, I still have not understood anything about the society that refuses to understand what a human being is, where I do not see any difficulty! I remind you that this person did not apply to exist, just like you, which did not give you the authorization to inflict the same sentence, at worst or at best you could have "avenge" on your spawners. Slaves of slaves of slaves of slaves of etc, so are we.

For the moment I do not see when your child could have acquired the guilt of any of his actions, even if this action does not enchant you and contravenes the social laws. In my humble opinion, if the Frankenstein and Co., that you are, have screwed up in the manufacture or education of the kid, the blame comes back to you. Personally, I granted you, this blame, as soon as you have expressed the desire to copulate to give birth to ... nobody knows what in advance. Well, as an animal that we all are, I forgive you, and as a quasi-human fellow slave, I totally disapprove of you, because you did not even ask my assent that I would not have granted you anyway, life being too dangerous and especially absurd to be lived. Let's move.

Today the French child does not undergo military service, which was my case. Miner until 21 years old, so I was a child soldier. They taught me to accept violent death and to give it without remorse. I was a sheep service slave apprentice killer of opposing sheep. Well, there are opponents in the game of life! Nice, happy to hear it! The world where you swung me is not healthy? And you say that you love me? At the time I was an unconscious domestic sheep, formatted for obedience, they could make me accept anything. My parents were perfect fellow citizens manufacturers of sheep slaves for assembly work, baby boom! In return for the nuclear boom of Hiroshima / Nagasaki and the shelling of Dresden, deafening the dead shredded themselves. Within two months, I was going to Chad to participate in the surveillance of these bandits of Africans always ready to fight with the good colonizers (GC). Sixteen months of maximum disaster as Murphy's law would say, one more. Am I guilty of something? Have I acquired the potential of guilt that cancels my innocence from existing as I am at parental and social demand, parents and societies unable to control what they do? I do not have that impression of it.

Let's find further into where this guilt of existing that transcends the innocence of existing can hide.

Do you know that they made you with a sex these idiots? It's serious, sex, looks lower, between your legs, it opens or it is brandished, it is according to. It's so serious that there are plenty of laws on the subject. There are even plenty of movies in the law and outlaw. Yet, this thing, the parents do not speak to you about it, or hardly, they do not dare, whereas it was necessary that they practiced diligently to force you to exist. It's more serious than food, sex, it's more serious for others, but they talk to you about 3-star food all day long and never libido, never copulation, never intromission, never orgasm, never an erection, never a chronic blood disease. You will learn the thing by surprise, a cudgel stood up, blood dripping. Are you guilty somewhere of owning existence and those underbelly orders, no more desired than life itself? Have you learned well or poorly how to control your urges? Are you guilty of your hormones, to have hormones? I still do not see where sexuality could make me more guilty than elsewhere.

But how do your educators teach you? By what clever way do they scribble in your brain the messages of their laws? Know first that the mass of neurons sizzling between your ears you got it with everything else, and without any guarantee from the manufacturer, that is to say, Mom helped, very little, by Dad. You are not responsible. It is here that most of our humanity is happening. At first it's like a white dictionary without anything written in it, without any definition, without any knowledge, without any meaning, because the brain will be a dictionary that will give you all information, meaning, and body control, then also dreams and all that, hallucinations, beliefs, and all the rest. But it's supposed to become a sort of dictionary, or rather a sloppy unsigned encyclopedia. Your educators like yourself do not write anything in this book, it manages itself. Your eyes are open, click like cameras, it records you do not know what or where or how. Your ears, microphones, they are always on the alert, otherwise, it is necessary to put earplugs to close them, but it works anyway. As for the eyes, the brain is activated continuously, we do not know what it does, but in general, it manages, and dad mom are happy with you when you repeat "parallelepiped" without fault or "mom" it's easier. They act as if you were the operator of your own brain. You will quickly become a genius when you are not autistic. For thousands of words, millions of actions, everything happens in the same way, and it's all the more of the kludge, that there are things registered without you being guilty of it. You're still not responsible for existing, are you? So why would you be guilty of an action committed by something that works by itself and you have not made, that is to say, yourself in flesh and blood?

And yet, watch out for punishments. You did not ask to exist, but the wallops can succeed one another, the bullying, the privations of dessert, the jail, the prison, Cayenne, nowadays it's the confiscated laptop or the console, the pocket money deleted. They are strong, parents, to make you feel guilty while you are for nothing in this game of life, this stupid board game. But since one made them the same thing, they repeat stupidly, it's normal. Who will break the chain of stupidities? Me me me me ME, meeeh …

The parents taught you the punitive system. He is well anchored in you, and you believe that it is right, that your conduct must be deserving, without fault. The society then takes the relay of the punishments. She is complicit in the crime of making your existence, but she will never punish herself for making and educating mistakes. Because she also educates without knowing how and punishes you that you do not know more than she on "how could you have messed around whereas they are so good with you to take care of you?" Society teaches you to say "I" and to take responsibility for this body that has the label "I" (the name that society has given you), while the thing works alone. All the cells that make up you, the billions and the others, are all automata that have no idea of your existence, they work for themselves, as selfishly as every living system on the planet and elsewhere. But you are the result of the activities of these cells and the rest. And all that has been imposed on you at the beginning of the making of your existence by the happy copulation of your parents, by the division (the multiplication) of a fertilized ovum. Are you responsible for this debonair ovum, this lively and muscular sperm that is making its way through the membrane? When do you become responsible to exist? When does your education take precedence over your innocence to exist? At what point does the "software" that your educators have tried to install in you become your responsibility to be what it is? Yes, you are all that, that body and that intellect, but it's not your fault. And when you say "I", it's the mental thing, the acquired software, that activates your imposed mouth and makes you say "I". And it's it, my own mental black box, that makes me write all these words, and I still do not know why I got there…

Is there a law that we would be known before our birth that proclaims that a new existence must respect laws that it would not have signed before existing?

You are guilty of nothing since you are not responsible for existing nor for existing as you are. The innocence of existence encompasses all of your existence from beginning to end, which mechanically encompasses the universe, itself innocent to be.

We are guilty when we derogate from social laws. Yet we are innocent when laws are illegitimate. All legal culprits are locked up illegitimately because we are all innocent to exist.

Innocent or guilty? The juror, I am, affirms our innocence.

End - E. Berlherm

Responsible or Aresponsible

Responsibility is a concept that did not exist originally in the animals we are. There is no responsibility to exist. Things are what they are by simple mechanism, the same goes for us. The universe exists without being responsible for it. The universe works as well as all its constituents of which we are part. Now we have invented the totally artificial concept of responsibility that makes no sense since our existence has been imposed on us.

With this existence, have been imposed on us our bodily capacities thus our means of action, and our intellectual capacities thus our means of control over our actions. Since they have been imposed on us, we therefore have no control over our means of control. How to be responsible for anything when there is no control over anything of our existence and our constituents, and no more of our environment?

What are your rights and duties since you have been forced to exist? Are you responsible for existing yourself and your bodily and intellectual imperfections? Since we are all associates, are not we all responsible for everyone's existence and everyone's education? How can I accuse someone of whom I am co-responsible for existence, co-responsible for his (supposed) qualities, but above all, for his (obvious) flaws, and co-responsible for the world in which I take part and in which I integrate him? If responsibility exists, it should be general.

Can we be subject to rules that we have not accepted, while social rules prohibit this constraint? Why is the initiation of our existence not subject to the rule of prohibition of the constraint of association, which is a law enacted in all human societies? How can I be responsible for my actions in your association, the Humane Society, when you have included me under duress? Not to mention the educational mental manipulations, and the constant coercion of your system on the intellect of humans who are born yet virgins of all cultural knowledge which also makes them innocent (not responsible) of the content of their intellects and thus for past acts, present, and future.

Responsible or Aresponsible: Responsible would mean responsible to exist as we are and where we are and have free will. Aresponsible is different from irresponsible who presumes that responsibility may exist. With the prefix "a" privative, it means that we are born and remain without any responsibility because existence is imposed in all cases.

The existence of things and beings is always without responsibility. The universe is not responsible for existing, and all that constitutes is also without responsibility. (And if a god were to be eternal he would not be more responsible for existing, which would disqualify him as a god.) We, humans, are components of the universe, we are just like it without responsibility to exist and therefore to all our actions. Every living being has no responsibility whatsoever since it exists because of a natural mechanism that has engendered it. For the first living beings, it was the universe that engendered them. For the following, it was in different ways, but among others, and in our case the procreation launched by our two parents, themselves not responsible for their existences.

Can we become responsible despite the aresponsibility (lack of responsibility) of our existence, of all forms of existence? It will be necessary to explain to me how this can be possible, even by inventing a so-called free will. My brain, therefore the processing of information, was imposed on me as well as the information itself. I was born virgins of all cultural knowledge and meanings. Everything was imposed on me. How can I become responsible for my own actions since what makes and directs my actions has been imposed on me? I'm no more responsible for the container that works alone, that content that installs itself. "I" am both at the same time, containing and content, and nothing else (I think of the soul of which besides I would not be more responsible for the existence, nor of its operation and its control of the body).

If there were to be a responsible, it should be the precedent and not the next, the cause not the effect, that is, the manufacturer and not the fabricated, the parent and not the child. And in the context of society, the latter being the power managing all individuals, thousands of years old, the mother of individuals, her responsibility should take precedence over all others. But, as we have seen, the existence of anything is without any responsibility, and therefore that of society as well.

How can a parent blame his child? How can the society which is for the older a sum of parents not understand this principle of innocence of all the children that we are? How could she invent the responsibility knowing herself not responsible for existing?

What does one gain by having invented responsibility? What are we losing?

How and why invent responsibility in an "aresponsible" universe? Can we invent an artificial responsibility? Is it possible whereas that everyone exists as he is and without his consent? My brain weighs a kilo and a few, would not I be more "responsible" if he weighed a few more pounds? I did not ask for its size, mechanisms, structure or functionality. How could I be responsible without having mastered the fabrication of myself, the way in which the information that my body will collect about the world will be processed and analyzed, in a world that I did not desire? How to be responsible for my actions when I did not ask for my muscular strengths, my weaknesses, my fragility, or yours? How can I master my brain, this thing that you say commands my activities, while neither you nor I know how it works, and of which I am not aware of the activity?

When will I become responsible to exist, then of my body and then of my own education, and then of actions produced by this set that I do not control? How can I master my body when each cell that composes me is an automaton absolutely ignorant of my existence? How can I master education, that is to say, the writing in the white paper that was my brain at birth while it works by itself, and that I put myself in front of the things to be acquired without that I master anything, no more my educators? I do not master the book, the fact that it is a kind of book, nor its structure, nor the way knowledge and meanings are written, and no more my educators.

When we are babies, the opening of the eyes and senses allows the gathering of information that is based on our placement in the world, according to the location and time where we live. These senses, we have not asked for, and not all people are equitably endowed, as well as the brain's ability to process the perceived signals. When do we become responsible for this mental and educational bric-a-brac made no matter how and still not at our request?

If you have emotions, impulses and desires, animal instincts, this is part of the bodily package given with your constrained existence. If society asks you to control your emotions, your impulses, desires, and instincts, is it not up to your educators to install the control systems of these emotions, impulses, desires, and instincts? Is it not up to her to verify that these control systems are perfectly installed, that they work optimally? In what way would you be responsible for everything when everything was imposed on you, and even the invention of responsibility and all the social culture that surrounds it? No, of course!

Can we be responsible for our own education, therefore the need for education, the mental mechanisms of learning, the technique of educators, the technique of memorizing of our brain, our memory capacities, our "intelligence" and IQ, the general functioning of the thought, the pre-existing functionalities, the functionalities acquired through existing functionalities? No, of course!

How, the animals that we are, have we invented responsibility, that of others and of oneself? To invent the responsibility of the other one must first invent intellectual equality, equality of understanding or at least to suppose him a capacity of sufficient understanding. To feel responsible for one's own actions, one must have been educated in this way.

Why did society invent this notion? This is undoubtedly a complex path. It must have started with the parent's animal reaction to his child's misunderstanding. Why does this child not understand when it seems very simple to the adult? They went from coerced education to punishment. Then they use the exemplary punishment of one to educate the other. This is the system of decimation. It seems more practical to eliminate the troublemaker than to look for where the problem is coming from. But the example of punishment is not justice because it is not egalitarian, and it is not good education because it does not correct the mistakes of educators and not those of evil educated, who are not responsible to exist, nor of their education, nor of their need to be educated.

Why, individually, do we feel responsible? Because it is an acquired "software" (remember that we are all born virgins of all cultural knowledge and meanings). We are educated to take responsibility from our very early childhood without ever being alluded to the fact that we have been forced to exist and that we are not responsible for anything. Few people in their lifetime make the remark that they have been forced to exist. The builders who are our parents and the educators discard their mistakes on the individuals they manufacture and educate. The adult who does not understand the functioning of the child imputes to him his erroneous actions. It is easy and convenient, but it is not profitable and even less ethical or moral.

If it were only a question of "disconnecting" a human being because its functioning disturbs the social workings, morality would not be too bad, but it is about suffering, mental and physical torture (potential gracefully attributed to the construction), that is inflicted on a person that society makes guilty while this society is responsible for its existence and its defects, even more today than yesterday because almost everything is controllable.

But is there not a confusion between two types of responsibilities? A responsibility to look after one's own body so that one can live better and independently, which can be learned just like any animal with a somewhat complex nervous system, and a responsibility to exist as we are with our functioning, which cannot be imputed to us.

The first is not really a responsibility, it is only capacities to acquire, to become autonomous, on the basis of the built features of birth. At your majority, you are released in nature, in society, with the social agreement since it is she, the society, that decided the age of the majority. Are you responsible for that, for your existence, for your growth, for this imperfect learning system in your imperfect mentality, whereas there are machines with immediate and perfectly controllable learning systems? Why were we made idiots at birth with the need to learn in a very limited world?

For the second, the impossibility of being responsible for existing leads to the lack of responsibility for our actions. Otherwise, the fact of having forced me to exist becomes a responsibility which must fall on my parents and their associates who have authorized my existence, since this launching is a voluntary, controlled and socially controllable act.

Which should be anyway since the act of procreation is supposed to be the most important of humanity. Are you punished by society if you make a handicapped child or with a defective gene? Will your child file a complaint against his procreators? Is he entitled to have lawyers to complain about the sentence he was given without reason?

Based on our ancient, unverbalized animal behavior, humans have invented a verbal culture that is more or less related to actual facts. Our culture has evolved and is still evolving. Its evolution can only fit more and more with reality as we understand this reality. But how long will it take for society as a whole to succeed when we cannot even get rid of the belief (the mental function of belief), and no longer manage the populating of the planet and the immense suffering of the people?

You might be angry with me for revealing a truth you would not have known, but how can I know it before revealing it to you? You could tell me that now that you've told me that you do not want this truth, I have to remove it from the web, but how would your opinion be better than mine and those of others who did not yet read this information and who have the same right as me to know the truth about everything?

Can we remove the notion of responsibility, and therefore accept the reality? The truth being better and better, it seems to me quite necessary. Truth cannot refuse. The universe is "Aresponsible", just like us. We exist, therefore without responsibility throughout this imposed existence.

As long as existence is imposed, the notion of responsibility must be removed. We cannot blame people for their actions. It sounds strange because our mental software finds this idea disturbing, but yet… it's time to change the software, our human world goes wrong.

End – E. Berlherm