The Police

The Police - December 2020

The Police

The French by birth have not been selected to be French; they are people who are born in France, their existence has been imposed on them with the agreement and therefore the social complicity; and they have been told "you are French". They were born because they were presented with the fait accompli of existing and being French. A policeman was not forced to be a policeman. He was selected from the French population. A policeman selected to keep the peace cannot be violent. There is no comparison between French violence and illegal police violence.

A Frenchman has been forced to exist and to be French, a policeman has not been forced to be a policeman.

The French can be violent, because they have the right to claim what is not given to them, the policemen (although fundamentally French and human) cannot be, because they do what they have accepted the job for. They have signed a contract, a pact with France. They have to respect the law because they signed a police contract. The first ones were not selected, they were forced, the second ones accepted the job, they were recruited, they were selected, and they were trained, in principle, for this difficult job. They accepted the job of a policeman voluntarily (to the extent of their relative mental freedom!). 

A policeman who breaks the law is not a policeman. A Frenchman by birth who breaks the law remains French.

The nuclear weapon is a principle of blackmail against other nations which means: if you attack me, I will destroy you with the total weapon. The police, the punishment, the sanction, the prison are weapons of blackmail against the French citizen, who is theoretically a partner and therefore not punishable (the national blackmail is in principle illegal, but exists in the same way as the constraint of existence which is an imprescriptible crime of slavery). The police, made up of selected Frenchmen, cannot use beatings to manage their associates. It is not ethical, it is not fair, and it is fundamentally stupid. 

The police is not a nuclear weapon of the state, a means of blackmail against its own citizens, its own partners. No one asked to exist, no one signed a contract of existence before existing, but the police officer signed it to commit himself. 

No one signed and no one would sign a contract of association if he were threatened with a beating, with prison, or with having his head cut off. The state cannot cane or imprison coerced partners who refuse to obey the laws of a contract they have not voluntarily signed.

The state must manage its citizens by means of a police force because humans are not intelligent; if they were, there would be no need to manage them, they would manage themselves. The State must manage the most virulent of the French, who certainly have reasons to be virulent. Why are they so? Perhaps because their existence has been imposed on them, perhaps because they have been forced into the national association, perhaps because they have not been given a good education and the capitalist principle is despoiling them with the help of the State, perhaps and above all because they do not have their due as equal partners. 

The State, after having given the agreement for the manufacture of imperfect partners by existing imperfect partners, who also know it, says to its partners "you behave well or I punish you". This is obviously stupid. If you know in advance that what you are making will be imperfect why build it and at worst why punish it. How can the manufactured being be anything but imperfect and act imperfectly?

People don't join the police force to have authority over others, they probably do it for the pay and sometimes for the priesthood, but holding authority inevitably corrupts, everyone knows that, and it must be controlled absolutely. A person who has any kind of authority ends up using it even when it is not appropriate. This is the way human psychology is today. 

No one on earth is educated enough to control the authority he sometimes has over another human. And when it is an authority granted by the law, it is even more obvious. How to prevent a simple civil servant, a peacekeeper from having this dictatorial behavior with his own associates-citizens?

Therefore, we must not forget the fundamental in the reflection. This fundamental is that even police officers have been forced to exist and that free will does not exist, which is the case for everyone. This constraint of existence makes us all innocent of existing, and this must always be taken into account, especially when one is in governance, in Justice, and of course in the police! The absence of free will implies that everyone must be educated correctly and thoroughly. The police have an enormous responsibility, which is social peace. Their education must be very thorough. They must have a great control over themselves and a great knowledge of human psychology.

Police officers should not hit their associates, their equals. To hit a person is to punish him or her as one would punish a child (in the old days!). It is not the role of the policeman to punish, it is the role of Justice. Justice, which in the context of the innocence of existing, should not punish, but educate and especially control the educators who do not do their job properly.

If a partner wants to denounce a contract, let the society tell him how to do it. This famous social contract that no one has ever signed and that has been imposed on us without being able to denounce it; and without being able to leave the society without physical and moral suffering. If you have never signed a social contract, you don't have to obey any order, except to be in a dictatorship in a kingdom and be a slave. Are we slaves of slaves? And if you have signed a social contract, any contract, you have the right to denounce it. Can you denounce the social contract?

We have all been forced into existence, even the police and the rulers, and contrary to what is stupidly repeated, we have no free will or responsibility for our actions (see my articles on these and other subjects). We are innocent of existing, because we are innocent of our physical and mental capacities and of their aberrant functionalities. Nobody is guilty of anything. We are all innocent to exist and of our actions throughout our lives. 

Invite your children to exist on a beautiful planet (clean it thoroughly first). Invite them kindly to have a beautiful, long, healthy, disability-free, in well-being, and exciting life. This would be better than cops, cameras, and drones everywhere.

End - E. Berlherm