Child begging

The following text could be used for any act of child abuse. To send a child to beg on the street is an act of abuse. To let him beg is an act of abuse. To look at him without acting or to give him a coin to ease one's conscience is complicity.

The Nations and their leaders who leave begging for their children, any children, no matter where they come from, are accomplices, and therefore are criminals.

To procreate, that is, to make a child, is to invite him to Earth; is it to make him a beggar? Is this how we welcome a guest that we have desired? Is this how we treat this guest who has no other way to leave our planet than to die?

Has this innocent child been brought to the world so that he must beg for food every day to maintain and build his body? Living just to survive, but what's the point? Is that what you intend for yourself? A life without interest!

Have you made it come out of nothingness, your child, to suffer, or to see you suffer? If you plan to suffer during your life, and you will suffer for sure, then why impose the vision of this suffering on your future child while you are going to do everything to ensure that he loves you. Do you think that it is easier to suffer to two than alone Madame?

A great many people will suffer around you and in the world during the life of your child. Do you think that you need to make additional eyes to admire this suffering, to admire the human misery? Are you masochist and sadistic at the same time?

To build a child is to invite him to our planet, we are the hosts of this child, who is also a person, as we ourselves are hosts of our ancestors and this planet. Prevention is better than cure? And once you have made a suffering being or given a stupid life how to undo what you did not want to do if you are a parent planning to love your child?

Because we are human people, are we not, thinking person, conscious, sensitive, and we possess the capacities of analysis and foresight. So before you start building a child in the female uterus, your uterus Madam, the fragile uterus of your wife, so fragile a woman, this fabrication so dangerous for the fragile and sensitive child that you desire, which is the most important act for every human being, why not take the time to think before?

But it is so nice to make love ... that we forget the pain and death that we will impose on an innocent person even more innocent than ourselves.

Here's what I'm able to predict what can happen to a child who would be put into this world:

He can be born seriously disabled or become disabled, he can quickly become an orphan, his parents may lose the means to live properly or become disabled themselves, he may be born in the middle of a war or suffer terrorism, nature can become violent with earthquakes floods hurricanes tsunamis fires, the society that houses him can become a dictatorship, and many other sneaky calamities like old and new epidemics (see the WHO website).

More than 350,000 babies are born each day, thousands of them will be disabled immediately or in their lifetime, that's absolutely certain. The builders you are, ladies, are extremely incompetent, you must recognize it. You just read this, my predictions have become yours.

To make a child by knowing all that, and you knew it before I told you about it, since you are a human being, so planning like me, so to make a child is to commit a criminal act by recklessness according to our laws, our own written laws and our own moral laws. If on top of that it is to have to put your child on the street as soon as he is able to walk and reach out the hand, to get rid of him because he is embarrassing you, so why make him?

Would you have wanted to be treated this way, yourself? All this was predictable. Is it the only desire for sex that made you improvident Madam? I specify, Madam, because your body belongs to you, it is not a land to plow nor a playground belonging to breeding males. You are the mistress of your body.

If responsibility exists, and according to you it exists, then you are responsible as an individual for what enters your body (a penis) and what comes out of it (a child, my associate, our associate with all of us).

A child is only made for the own service of the parents, and certainly not his. Procreate is a totally selfish service that one gives to oneself. There is no worse danger than to exist. And it is useless to go from the state of non-existence to that of being alive. We do not win anything to exist.

My incredible adventures of being alive will not brighten my bones in the grave or my ashes if I am cremated. How will a begging child thank his parents for living a life a thousand times more absurd than mine? What is the use of offering him as a welcome gift on the planet the difficulty of living? To tramp to survive. To beg for survival.

Food is as necessary as the air your child breathes. Why did you build him with a stomach if it is not to offer him its food as a guest of the Earth? Why did you just invite him? Is not this a warm welcoming, a friendly invitation? Have not you planned to show him how beautiful life is on the planet? Have you not planned to love the one you put before the fait accompli of existence?

The children are placed before the fait accompli of existence, as you have been yourself, did you do it in your turn, your child, to avenge yourself or by a mere animal need of reproduction? Have you made your child so that he begs for his body?

To make children to enliven one's life is stupid and absurd. It's an abject vicious circle.

We are nearly 8 billion inhabitants on the planet, our species is not on the list of species in danger of extinction except by our warrior stupidity. You know, madam, that men are violent, are not they? Must you add an extra warrior to the men's army to defend you from the army of other men?

To make children by mistake, or by violating, is not human, it is animal. Abort it! A life does not deserve to be inflicted or lived in a world of rapists and idiots.

To make children for the survival of the species is stupid since you do not even know what a species is. Take a long, hard look in the mirror. Do you see anything other than a maggot? Moreover, a "species" is perennial with only ten thousand individuals who would be happy to know each other and to know that nobody lacks anything from birth.

Whereas at ten billion it is rather war after war after war, since time immemorial. And it's children on the streets who have not asked to exist, let alone to live fooled by you, the mothers.

To make children for society is even more absurd, as society is not a thinking being. And, individuals associate, that is, form a society, to protect themselves from another society. What stupidity! Why add a problem instead of deleting it?

To make children for a possible god, what's the point, since in a word he can make himself myriads of servants, and even better, he can render himself service with a simple word, and therefore what is for him the use of servants? What would be the point of stupid companions when he can make them as intelligent as he is? What do you want such a god to make children who will become cunning and vicious, with reason, to live a life of beggars?

Your parents did not give you birth by pure goodness of soul, it is not a profit for you to exist, you gain nothing, the only winners are them and not always, because that theirs often attracts annoyances, but they believe to be in their right by making you. Their eggs and sperm belong to them, so they start your manufacturing, and then without any shame, if they can not feed you until you reach the age of majority, well they'll swing you in the street. What morality!

Making a child is like pottery, we make a ceramic pot, we put it in the oven, when the cooking is over it will be the surprise. After a quick review, if the pot is missed, well too bad, it is thrown in the dumpster and let's do it again.

With the baby, the oven is the maternal belly, but lack of luck (fortunately or unfortunately for the toddler) we can not break this kind of pot once it is out in the open, the law forbids it, so it is balanced in the street and even when it has no apparent defect (but there are always faults, even from you, the proof!)

Now, let's talk about society, the one that is supposed to protect us throughout our life and that taxes us dearly for this security. What is the use of society to let an existence be created that will begin life begging, that is to say, that has no use for society except that of having to be watched, because these beggars provide society in bandits?

Since this person, this beggar, lives, as long as he lives, it is because he finds the means, and therefore that he eats the social remains like a rat in a garbage can. A society is an association between humans, how can you treat your associates as rats?

What vision do you have of yourself if all you can guarantee, to people who have not asked to exist, is this kind of unhealthy and absurd life in your rubbish?

The role of the Nation is to foresee. To foresee in order to give an interesting life to each person who lives on the territory, otherwise it is useless to have authorized their manufacture, their procreation.

Has the state planned to let your children die from hunger? Does he plan to educate them to the harsh in the street? Does he plan to teach them how to reach out? Has he planned to let them beg their daily bread? Does he need additional offenders to assert his authority? If this is what the state has planned for your children, then avoid doing it. The state does not love you.

He does not like you, Madam. He does not like you Sir. You serve him only as flesh fodder, tax fodder, and cannon fodder. You are the pieces of his absurd social game.

If society is interested only in the usefulness of people for society, it is because they consider them slaves. Is this the humanity, the humanity of your rulers, your own humanity, because you are an associate, we are all associated as soon as we exist and not only between humans?

In any case, do not put your child on the street. Go see social assistance. It's their job to make up for your shortcomings, your errors, your mistakes. Society has planned everything, at least, as we have seen, it is the job of the state to foresee. The term "Society" means that the humans who compose it are associated to manage a territory of which they are co-owners, as well as, and especially, the associates or their guests who live on this territory.

If you have been allowed to have a child, it is because the society needs new partners to replace those who die or leave the territory.

This implicit authorization granted to you to procreate gives you the right to claim what the society owes you because to live is necessarily to need food, protection, housing, to the strict minimum. Why else are you allowed to manufacture an additional partner?

Society does not have the right to treat the begging of its children as a simple collateral damage. Every individual is important because society is made up of individuals. The Society cannot be a vicious circle which needs pawn-slaves to keep its status as a society.

A society that does not guarantee an exhilarating life to each of its associates does not do its job. To make everyone find an interest in living must be his goal.

Why must we always remember that we are all innocent to exist, all innocent of our bodies, all innocent of our intellects, therefore all innocent of our actions? The making of an existence only serves those that already exist and no one masters this fabrication. Why make a child if it is to put him in the street?

When we plan to have a child (since we are not animals, we plan, do not we?) We also need to plan the whole life of the child. The society agrees with getting new partners to replace the old ones, this agreement is worth contract. So why do parents make more children than society can handle peacefully, and without society doing anything to give the best to each of his new partners, his children?

Besides, why does one have to earn a living, since it has been imposed on us? Since we have been forced to exist, should not we have a good life, a healthy body, a healthy intellect, a long and interesting life, otherwise what is the use of forcing us to exist?

There are different types of child begging in each country and according to countries. Beggar children are on the street for different reasons:

    • There are orphans of mother and / or father. Society abandons them to their fate (the Nation probably does not consider itself as a society and the rulers are not guarantors of their associates).

    • They are kicked out for X reasons. Parents do not feel responsible for making children. If you are not responsible for the existence of your children, who is? Can a person be responsible for existing, and for existing as it is? What nonsense!

 • Parents are out of work or earn very little. You did not plan that? Yet it's predictable, since I've written it here and it's happening constantly on Earth.

    • Parents beg with their child (ren). Hey, society! Do not look in the air, these beggars and their children are your associates. Getting them out of the shit is your job, it's imperative.

    • Children are sent to "religion" and beg "religiously", they ask for alms of a piece or a bowl of rice. If you were made with a stomach and hunger as a signal, is it for begging? Why fabricate us so, controlled by a perpetual hunger, while we ourselves are already able to make machines that feed on light?

    • There are nearly 100,000 child beggars in Senegal, the "Talibés", 100,000 collateral damage which Senegalese society don't care. Yet did Senegal give the green light to mothers to have these children made to serve Senegal? What will Senegal do with these badly educated pawns, these wobbly pawns that will make Senegal skewed? A single lost year per child multiplied by 100,000 is 100,000 years lost for Senegal, would there not be better to do than to force these children to exist without reason?

    • Migrant beggars. Why are there migrants? Because the society that hosted them did not do its job of forecasting. Because societies fight each other instead of helping each other, instead of trying to understand each other. Because the powerful are not interested in the teeming people they perceive as vermin.

    • Congratulations to France and other rich nations who leave these people beg as if their lives were not worth the trouble!

    • I let you find the other examples. Put them in comments, please.

The begging of children is like the death penalty, they come from the same problem of misunderstanding of who we really are, and the refusal to apprehend it by the mass that transmits its stupidity to its leaders:

We are all innocent to exist. One has all been forced us to exist, and this "one" are our parents forced to exist before us, and so on by recurrence, to the animal basic. But are we still animals that copulate for no reason and reproduce without knowing why, without being able to control our actions?

We are all innocent to exist, all innocent of our bodies and our intellects, so all innocent of our actions throughout an existence that we did not ask. We are truly innocent of all our actions, because nothing of what we are has been asked by ourselves, neither the life nor the environment, nor our educators, nor culture, nor society.

And of course, given that we are born virgins of all cultural knowledge and that our brain functions like a black box, we obviously can not acquire free will, this is absolutely impossible, free will is technically impossible, and besides, this obligation to exist makes us innocent of everything.

Could we not just understand this principle? Could we not disseminate it, make it understand if it is necessary by insisting, while it is very simple to understand? Free will is not necessary to understand, we are capable of understanding things that are more complex than that.

The law prohibits an abuse of authority or of a position of vulnerability, which is such that the person has no real and acceptable alternative but to submit to the abuse; even more if it is a child, and there is no more child than one who is born without having given permission.

This is exactly the case of procreation with the obligation that is made us to exist, and the obligation to work so as not to starve and protect oneself. We are made by our parents with the obligation of having to feed us, on pain of hunger and even death, which is obviously well known to all their associates.

Society and parents use this constant threat to our life to force us to work until death. But the Social Law prohibits this kind of threat. How is it that nobody understands this permanent blackmail of society on its own associates? Or rather, how is it that everyone turns a blind eye to this obvious blackmail? Work or die of hunger!

How is it that humanity who preaches humanism multiplies the number of these unhappy children instead of guaranteeing them a healthy, happy, long, and interesting life? What don't you understand in this simple sentence?

The authorization to beg is a social aberration, since we are forced to exist to serve parents and societies. How to exist without food, without health, without protection? Why make us exist and let go in nature as an animal would? Why authorize the manufacture of a person if there is the slightest risk that the child ends up on the street or worse that he is born handicapped?

Children and parents are our associates, the concept of "deprivation of care", mentioned in the law, should be as valid for children as for parents. Society is the mother of all its associates, the "care deprivation" also applies to it. Society must be punished as a legal person. Do not hesitate to make a complaint, make collectives, associations, gather up.

The current penal system makes it possible to punish the perpetrators of the exploitation of children and the trafficking of human beings in the context of begging. To make a child for oneself or society, is it not trafficking in human beings?

French law says: "It is therefore in the interest of the children not to be separated from their parents, except to prove that the parents actually exploit their children or are harmful to them." Parents are always harmful to their children since the making of an existence is an infinite risk and slavery to say the least. But as society is a collection of parents, obviously it is not his interest to self-flagellate. She turns a blind eye to her own crimes.

Society can not reproach anyone with anything, because it has authorized with full knowledge of the facts, for the fabrication and imperfect education of imperfect beings.

Individuals can not blame society for free will does not exist and a society is a collection of individuals who still live according to customs older than them, customs generated by people who knew less than us.

What should be done in this case to solve the general problem of human relationships? Well, admit what you are, what we are all without exception, because no one is guilty of existing. And, everyone, get to work. Send the message. It's time to stop messing around.

End – E. Berlherm